ASP.NET 2.0

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (HC Team)

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:40:30 GMT

We did not add any special permission to support ASP.NET 2.0 rest It was already explained in these threads. 1 & 2

Abdullah

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (boonchuan)

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:10:09 GMT

What sort of mappings and permissions are we expected to see to confirm that ASP Dot Net in 2.6 is actually working? Thanks

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (HC Team)

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:02:23 GMT

Hotfix 2.6 has been released. Please download it from this URL. It has support for ASP.NET 2.0.

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (comdotitaly)

Sun, 13 Nov 2005 03:42:53 GMT

This is my temporary asp.net fix, hoping can be of help. It implements the two button 1.x/2.0 enable function.

Please, read the readme.txt file to make it work properly on your installation.

ASP.NET temp fix

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (pverzoni)

Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:14:19 GMT

I dont see any difference, under mappings (home directory -> Configuration -> Mappings) they are still all mapped to 1.1.

If you got to asp.net tab in IIS you stil see it in 1.1.

Yes applied the fix

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (boonchuan)

Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:40:36 GMT

The Hosting Controller setting is still pointing to ver 1, do we need to change this setting manually?

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (HC Team)

Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:53:45 GMT

I have uploaded the fix at this URL. Please download and replace files as mentioned in Read Me file accompained with it and let me know about your findings. Thanx

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (hgurol)

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:51:10 GMT

v1.1 was only %90 compatible with 1.0 and that %10 part was enough to produce a hell of a problem to us. It was specially something with validators as long as I remember. Im not a developer, a developer would explain it better than I do. I dont need to look for an article to prove my theory, actually its not a theory but a fact which I have experienced with the previous upgrade. You are already working on and investigating this issue and Im sure you will find related articles about it.

There was a special directive like "Require version=1.0" which you place in the web.config files of the applications to make them work with the older version. We have tried that in the past and expected it to solve our problems at that time but honestly the only solution worked for us was to point the old version path in the script mappings. This is also something I have experienced in the past, not a theory.

Anyway, you will find related information during your investigation if you know what to look for and now you know what to look for :)

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (HC Team)

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:10:29 GMT

Did you mean that there are some version specific code problems in ASP.Net and new version is not backward compatible, that might crash the code already running on sites? I do not consider Microsoft would do such things.

Anyway we have seen some articles showing that people tend to use multiple versions of .Net framework on their systems, so we would be supporting it too. But we are not satisfied with your reasoning that the .Net code that was working on previous version would break on this latest version 2.0. I¬m sure you would have some articles to prove this theory. Thanx

Abdullah

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (hgurol)

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 05:32:14 GMT

As comdotitaly have already said; the migration from 1.1 to 2.0 will not be fast. Some of the client, both the current ones and the new coming ones, will need asp.net version 1.1 while some of them will ask for the new 2.0 version. This requires us to provide both versions at the sometime so that clients can choose which version they want to work with. If they upgrade their code to 2.0 they would be able to switch themselves to 2.0 while others may want to keep their 1.1 version. If I globally upgrade my version and force every client, at least every new client to use the new 2.0 version I probably will be losing them. I can not make a cut and do a sharp 2.0 upgrade for the whole server. This migration will take time and during that time both of them should be avaliable to customers upon their request.

I hope this is clear enough.

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (HC Team)

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 04:26:48 GMT

Please explain why you want to keep multiple versions of ASP.NET?

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (hgurol)

Sun, 11 Sep 2005 02:49:48 GMT

Which will help nothing Im not sure if you have realized the need here. Would you like to re-read the thread or want me to re-phrase the need to you?

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (HC Team)

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:34:07 GMT

ASP.NET 2.0 would be supported soon but HC will not handle more than one ASP version simultaneously. Whatever version path you have provided in HC Settings under Scripting tab HC will set mappings accordingly.

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (comdotitaly)

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:44:46 GMT

Another thing. Dotnet 1.x and 2.x cannot run mixed in the same application pool.
So all dotnet 2.0 sites have to be grouped on a dedicated application pool.

RE: ASP.NET 2.0 (HC Team)

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:17:57 GMT

Thank you very much "comdotitaly" and "hgurol
" for the information. I will keep updating you about its support with HC. :)